NATSO, SIGMA urge DOE to adopt ‘market-oriented, tech-neutral approach’ to decarbonizing transport
NATSO, representing travel centers and truck stops, and SIGMA: America's Leading Fuel Marketers, urged the U.S. DOE to adopt a market-oriented, technology-neutral approach to transportation decarbonization.
“Any policies to scale production of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) should carefully consider the economy-wide ramifications of prioritizing nascent fuel technologies above longstanding lower-carbon fuel options, such as biodiesel and renewable diesel,” the groups stated in a Nov. 3 press release.
NATSO and SIGMA stated that while fuel retailers and marketers appreciate the Biden administration prioritizing alternative-fueling strategies to reduce carbon emissions from transportation, the administration's approach to increasing SAF production “ignores harmful side effects to the existing refueling landscape.”
Responding to a request for information, NATSO and SIGMA urged DOE to harness the decarbonization benefits of renewable diesel and biodiesel, rather than “pursue policies that will destroy demand for over-the-road biofuels that have been reducing ground emissions for decades,” the organizations stated.
“The Biden administration should not surrender the market’s ability to deliver dramatic near-term emissions savings by imposing a top-down, hurried transition to one technology,” NATSO and SIGMA wrote in their comments to DOE. “The administration should harness the near-term decarbonization potential of low-carbon options like biodiesel and renewable diesel, in addition to incentivizing more aspirational longer-term technologies.”
According to NATSO and SIGMA, “Preferential treatment for SAF for reducing transportation carbon emissions will unravel decades of existing carbon reductions in over-the-road transportation while increasing fuel prices for commercial fleets. SAF is more energy intensive to produce and saves less carbon emissions than renewable diesel, according to a research study conducted by LMC International, titled ‘Comparative Economic Analysis of Renewable Jet Fuel and Renewable Diesel.’ Because these fuels compete for the same feedstock, prioritizing SAF will undercut and eventually eliminate America’s biodiesel and renewable diesel market as disproportionate pressure is placed on feedstock.”
The trucking industry delivers more than 80 percent of America’s goods and relies on biofuels, including renewable diesel and biodiesel, to dramatically reduce carbon emissions.
Biofuels represent the best opportunity for reducing carbon emissions from the nation’s existing commercial fleet of trucks for the foreseeable future.
Biodiesel and renewable diesel eliminated 15 million metric tons of CO2 in California alone in 2020, the equivalent of taking more than 3 million passenger cars off the roads.
Compared with petroleum-based diesel, renewable diesel and biodiesel reduce greenhouse-gas emissions by up to 80 percent.
The California Air Resources Board recently underscored their important role in reducing carbon emissions, announcing that renewable diesel and biodiesel constitute more than half of the diesel supply in California.
“By implementing strategies that promote parity between over-the-road and aviation renewable fuels that compete for the same feedstock, the administration has an opportunity to lower the cost of fuel for trucking fleets and commercial drivers and ensure fuel-market stability while advancing its goal of reducing transportation’s carbon footprint,” NATSO and SIGMA stated. “One such strategy is for the Department of Treasury to subject SAF to more stringent lifecycle greenhouse-gas emissions-modeling requirements under the tax credits enacted under the Inflation Reduction Act.”
